Fussell v. Daniels
This text of 176 S.E. 369 (Fussell v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. Civil Code, § 3016; Crawford v. Wilson, 139 Ga. 654 (78 S. E. 30, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 773) ; Richardson v. Cade, 150 Ga. 535 (104 S. E. 207); Ansley v. Ansley, 154 Ga. 357 (114 S. E. 182); Fay v. Burton, 147 Ga. 648 (95 S. E. 222); Heery v. Heery, 144 Ga. 467 (87 S. E. 472); Eagon v. Conway, 115 Ga. 130 (41 S. E. 493); Belt v. Lazenby, 126 Ga. 767 (56 S. E. 81).
2. The special grounds of demurrer, so far as meritorious, were met by amendment. While other grounds may have pointed out defects in the pleadings, they were not of such materiality as to make it reversible error to overrule them. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 S.E. 369, 179 Ga. 462, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fussell-v-daniels-ga-1934.