Fussell v. Daniels

176 S.E. 369, 179 Ga. 462, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 309
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 17, 1934·No. No. 10065·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. Civil Code, § 3016; Crawford v. Wilson, 139 Ga. 654 (78 S. E. 30, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 773) ; Richardson v. Cade, 150 Ga. 535 (104 S. E. 207); Ansley v. Ansley, 154 Ga. 357 (114 S. E. 182); Fay v. Burton, 147 Ga. 648 (95 S. E. 222); Heery v. Heery, 144 Ga. 467 (87 S. E. 472); Eagon v. Conway, 115 Ga. 130 (41 S. E. 493); Belt v. Lazenby, 126 Ga. 767 (56 S. E. 81).

2. The special grounds of demurrer, so far as meritorious, were met by amendment. While other grounds may have pointed out defects in the pleadings, they were not of such materiality as to make it reversible error to overrule them. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. E. L. Grantham and Kelley & Dickerson, for plaintiffs in error. McDonald & Gilson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fussell v. Daniels, 176 S.E. 369, 179 Ga. 462, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 309 (Ga. 1934).

176 S.E. 369 (Fussell v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toler v. Goodin
37 S.E.2d 609 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Thompson v. Riggs
19 S.E.2d 299 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Boles v. Eddleman
6 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Rieves v. Smith
192 S.E. 372 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)