Fuss v. State

120 S.E. 37, 31 Ga. App. 147, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 788
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1923·No. 14807·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

This case is controlled by the ruling in McNeely v. State, 25 Ga. App, 328 (1) (103 S. E. 189). In the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error it is urged that the foregoing decision “should be reconsidered and overruled,” but we are content to let it stand.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuss v. State, 120 S.E. 37, 31 Ga. App. 147, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 788 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

120 S.E. 37 (Fuss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNeely v. State
103 S.E. 189 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)