Fusco v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

264 A.D. 876, 35 N.Y.S.2d 551
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Defendant in an action on ah industrial policy of life insurance appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the verdict of a jury. Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. By stipulation of the parties the only issue tried and submitted to the jury was whether defendant had waived the right to declare the policy void under one of its provisions. Plaintiff’s evidence, intended to show a waiver, was insufficient to take the case to the jury on that issue. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fusco v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 264 A.D. 876, 35 N.Y.S.2d 551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

264 A.D. 876 (Fusco v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lang v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
277 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)