Fusaro v. Coffey

158 A.D.2d 582, 551 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1963

This text of 158 A.D.2d 582 (Fusaro v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fusaro v. Coffey, 158 A.D.2d 582, 551 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

On the instant appeal, the defendants allege, inter alia, that (1) the defendant Francis J. Coffey submitted his own affidavit, dated January 20, 1988, which raised issues of fact in the instant action, and (2) the Supreme Court, as evidenced by its memorandum decision, disregarded that affidavit. Accordingly, the defendants argue that the Supreme Court erroneously granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

We have reviewed the affidavit of the defendant Francis J. Coffey and the other papers in the record, and are of the view that no triable issues of fact are raised in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (see, Lieberman v [583]*583Pettinato, 120 AD2d 646; Koo v Gross, 133 AD2d 613). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lieberman v. Pettinato
120 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Koo v. Gross
133 A.D.2d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 582, 551 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fusaro-v-coffey-nyappdiv-1990.