Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC v. Moda Collision Repair, LLC

District Court, S.D. California·Decided August 14, 2024·No. 3:23-cv-01559·Unknown

Opinion

FUSA FRANCHISOR SPV LLC, a Case No.: 23-CV-1559 JLS (BJC) Delaware limited liability company, ORDER APPROVING Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL v. (ECF No. 26) MODA COLLISION REPAIR, LLC dba FIX AUTO VANCOUVER-WALNUT GROVE, a Washington limited liability company; and ANDREY STEFANCO, an individual, Defendants.

Presently before the Court is the Stipulation for Dismissal (“Stip.,” ECF No. 26) filed jointly by Plaintiff Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC and Defendant Andrey Stefanco (collectively, the “Parties”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Good cause appearing, the Court APPROVES the Stipulation and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE all claims that were asserted or could have been asserted in this action, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Further, as requested in the Stipulation, the Court will retain jurisdiction over the Parties to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement for a period not to exceed six months from the date of this Order. See Seldon v. George Brown Sports Club - Palm, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-01421-DAD-SAB, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1246, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2019) (“Federal courts may, within their discretion, retain jurisdiction over settlement agreements reached out of court.” (citing Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994))). As this concludes the litigation in this matter, the Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file. Dated: August 13, 2024 jae L. Lo memeaite- g on. Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC v. Moda Collision Repair, LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2024).

Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC v. Moda Collision Repair, LLC (Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC v. Moda Collision Repair, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)