Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC v. Moda Collision Repair, LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 FUSA FRANCHISOR SPV LLC, a Case No.: 23-CV-1559 JLS (BJC) Delaware limited liability company, 12 ORDER APPROVING Plaintiff, 13 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL v. 14 (ECF No. 26) MODA COLLISION REPAIR, LLC dba 15 FIX AUTO VANCOUVER-WALNUT 16 GROVE, a Washington limited liability company; and ANDREY STEFANCO, an 17 individual, 18 Defendants. 19

20 Presently before the Court is the Stipulation for Dismissal (“Stip.,” ECF No. 26) 21 filed jointly by Plaintiff Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC and Defendant Andrey Stefanco 22 (collectively, the “Parties”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Good cause 23 appearing, the Court APPROVES the Stipulation and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE 24 all claims that were asserted or could have been asserted in this action, with each party to 25 bear its own costs and fees. Further, as requested in the Stipulation, the Court will retain 26 jurisdiction over the Parties to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement for a period 27 not to exceed six months from the date of this Order. See Seldon v. George Brown Sports 28 Club - Palm, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-01421-DAD-SAB, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1246, at *1 1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2019) (“Federal courts may, within their discretion, retain jurisdiction 2 || over settlement agreements reached out of court.” (citing Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. 3 || Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994))). 4 As this concludes the litigation in this matter, the Clerk of the Court SHALL 5 || CLOSE the file. 7 ||Dated: August 13, 2024 jae L. Lo memeaite- g on. Janis L. Sammartino 9 United States District Judge

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28