Furtado v. Davenport
This text of Furtado v. Davenport (Furtado v. Davenport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6223
EDSON FURTADO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHEILA DAVENPORT, CEO; LAWRENCE TAYLOR, Capt.; STATE OF MARYLAND; PAULO NEGRO, Dr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv- 02996-RWT)
Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this
appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Furtado’s motion for
appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Furtado v. Davenport, No. 8:07-cv-
02996-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Furtado v. Davenport, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furtado-v-davenport-ca4-2008.