Furtado ex rel. Furtado v. Walmer
This text of 673 So. 2d 568 (Furtado ex rel. Furtado v. Walmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We find no error in the trial court’s failure to grant appellants’ request for a jury instruction on aggravation of a preexisting condition.
Although we conclude that the trial court erred in precluding appellants’ counsel from eliciting the identity of the insurance carrier in his redirect examination of Dr. Alexakis, see Krawzak v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 660 So.2d 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), rev. granted, 670 So.2d 938 (Fla.1996), we find such error to be harmless under the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 So. 2d 568, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5169, 1996 WL 271550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furtado-ex-rel-furtado-v-walmer-fladistctapp-1996.