Furtado ex rel. Furtado v. Walmer
Opinions
We find no error in the trial court’s failure to grant appellants’ request for a jury instruction on aggravation of a preexisting condition.
Although we conclude that the trial court erred in precluding appellants’ counsel from eliciting the identity of the insurance carrier in his redirect examination of Dr. Alexakis, see Krawzak v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 660 So.2d 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), rev. granted, 670 So.2d 938 (Fla.1996), we find such error to be harmless under the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
673 So. 2d 568 (Furtado ex rel. Furtado v. Walmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.