Furr v. Horry County Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 2, 2016·No. 27608·Published

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Supreme Court

Fayrell Furr and Karole Jensen, Petitioners,

v.

Horry County Zoning Board of Appeals, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000271

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Horry County J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 27608

Heard December 2, 2015 – Filed March 2, 2016

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY

GRANTED

Gene McCain Connell, Jr., of Kelaher Connell & Connor, P.C., of Surfside Beach, for Petitioners.

Leah Montgomery Cromer and Emma Ruth Brittain, both of Thomas & Brittain, P.A., of Myrtle Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' opinion in Furr v. Horry Ctny. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 411 S.C. 178, 767 S.E.2d 221 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice Jean H. Toal, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furr v. Horry County Zoning Board of Appeals, (S.C. 2016).

Furr v. Horry County Zoning Board of Appeals (Furr v. Horry County Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Furr v. Horry County Zoning Board of Appeals
767 S.E.2d 221 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2014)