Furniss v. Hone

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Furniss v. Hone

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 413

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedJuly 1, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 413 (Furniss v. Hone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furniss v. Hone, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 413 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

[414]*414The Chancellor held it a mere conditional delivery and decreed that Duane, as a general assignee to secure antecedent debts, could not hold the goods against the vendor. On appeal from this decree,

The Court of Errors reversed the decree; holding that, even if the delivery were conditional and not absolute, that a delay of seven days in sending for the notes, would be considered as a waiver oí the condition.

Decree reversed, 18 to 4.

93= See Haggerty v. Palmer, 6 J. C. R. 437.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[414]*414The Chancellor held it a mere conditional delivery and decreed that Duane, as a general assignee to secure antecedent debts, could not hold the goods against the vendor. On appeal from this decree,

The Court of Errors reversed the decree; holding that, even if the delivery were conditional and not absolute, that a delay of seven days in sending for the notes, would be considered as a waiver oí the condition.

Decree reversed, 18 to 4.

93= See Haggerty v. Palmer, 6 J. C. R. 437.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furniss-v-hone-nycterr-1799.