Furnish v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Furnish v. Robison

157 S.W. 744, 106 Tex. 79, 1913 Tex. LEXIS 84

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJune 4, 1913

DocketNo. 2308.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 157 S.W. 744 (Furnish v. Robison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furnish v. Robison, 157 S.W. 744, 106 Tex. 79, 1913 Tex. LEXIS 84 (Tex. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice BE 0WIST

delivered the opinion of the court.

■Eelator seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondent requiring him to reinstate a purchase of school land which had been awarded to relator and thereafter declared forfeited. Eespondent answered, setting up facts which would defeat the relator’s right. This presents a case involving disputed issues of fact, which this court can not try. Wooten v. Rogan, 96 Texas, 434.

It is therefore ordered that the case be dismissed.

Justice Hawkins did not sit in this case.'

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI