Furnish v. Robison

157 S.W. 744, 106 Tex. 79, 1913 Tex. LEXIS 84
Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 4, 1913·No. No. 2308.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice BE 0WIST

delivered the opinion of the court.

■Eelator seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondent requiring him to reinstate a purchase of school land which had been awarded to relator and thereafter declared forfeited. Eespondent answered, setting up facts which would defeat the relator’s right. This presents a case involving disputed issues of fact, which this court can not try. Wooten v. Rogan, 96 Texas, 434.

It is therefore ordered that the case be dismissed.

Justice Hawkins did not sit in this case.'

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furnish v. Robison, 157 S.W. 744, 106 Tex. 79, 1913 Tex. LEXIS 84 (Tex. 1913).

157 S.W. 744 (Furnish v. Robison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheppard v. Jacksboro Refining Co.
110 S.W.2d 1004 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Sherman v. Hatcher
299 S.W. 227 (Texas Supreme Court, 1927)