Furness, Withy Co. v. Randall
This text of 91 A. 800 (Furness, Withy Co. v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The questions of law presented by this appeal are identical with those considered in the. case of Furness, Withy & Co. v. Blanchard Randall et al., ante p. 101. The only points of difference are, that three contracts, dated, respectively, September 21st, 23rd and October 4th, 1911, are here involved instead of one. The notice or “nomination” sent on December 2nd, designating the Amana as the vessel on which the shipments were -to be carried, bore upon its face the approval of Fahey & Co. The pleadings, evidence and rulings were simply a repetition of those in the case of Gill & Fisher, and for the reasons there given the judgment appealed from will be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a neiu trial, appellees to pay costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A. 800, 124 Md. 110, 1914 Md. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furness-withy-co-v-randall-md-1914.