Furnan v. Harman

13 S.C.L. 442
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1823·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Colcock

delivered the opinion of the court:

The court are of opinion that the entry on the back of the record was a sufficient compliance with the order made for security for costs, and that the nonsuit should not have been ordered. If there was surprize, it would have been a good ground for continuance. The first; ground was abandoned.

The motion is granted.

Justices Johnson, Huger, Richardson and Nott, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furnan v. Harman, 13 S.C.L. 442 (S.C. 1823).

13 S.C.L. 442 (Furnan v. Harman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.