Furnald v. Burbank
30 A. 409, 67 N.H. 595
Opinion
The plaintiff having restored to the trial the fairness of which he had divested it, and having made it appear affirmatively that the jury were not influenced by his unwarranted statement (Bullard v. Railroad, 64 N. H. 27, 32), the order must be
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Furnald v. Burbank, 30 A. 409, 67 N.H. 595 (N.H. 1892).
30 A. 409 (Furnald v. Burbank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Story v. Concord & Montreal Railroad
48 A. 288 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)