Furnald v. Burbank
30 A. 409, 67 N.H. 595
This text of 30 A. 409 (Furnald v. Burbank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Furnald v. Burbank, 30 A. 409, 67 N.H. 595 (N.H. 1892).
Opinion
The plaintiff having restored to the trial the fairness of which he had divested it, and having made it appear affirmatively that the jury were not influenced by his unwarranted statement (Bullard v. Railroad, 64 N. H. 27, 32), the order must be
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Story v. Concord & Montreal Railroad
48 A. 288 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 A. 409, 67 N.H. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furnald-v-burbank-nh-1892.