Furnald v. Burbank

30 A. 409, 67 N.H. 595
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

The plaintiff having restored to the trial the fairness of which he had divested it, and having made it appear affirmatively that the jury were not influenced by his unwarranted statement (Bullard v. Railroad, 64 N. H. 27, 32), the order must be

Exception overruled.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furnald v. Burbank, 30 A. 409, 67 N.H. 595 (N.H. 1892).

30 A. 409 (Furnald v. Burbank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Story v. Concord & Montreal Railroad
48 A. 288 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)