Furman v. Hinz
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 674
Opinion
The learned, judge in the court below erred in excluding the counterclaim interposed in this case. It is expressly provided for by section 506 of the Code. See Bathgate v. Haskin, 59 N. Y., 533; S. C., 63 id., 261.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Furman v. Hinz, 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 674 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 674 (Furman v. Hinz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bathgate v. . Haskin
59 N.Y. 533 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)