Furman v. Haskin
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. The two objections to this plea, which require consideration, are, 1. That the plaintiff being an innocent endorsee without notice, is not affected by the transactions which took place between Buckle and the defendant; 2. That there is no venue in that part of the plea, alleging the time when the note was negotiated. As to the first, it is a general rule, that a note payable on demand must be presented for payment within a reasonable time, or it will be considered as a note out of time, and dishonored. Chitty, 114,. 146.
Hanson. We have, then, to ask leave of the court to withdraw the demurrer and take issue on the fact.
Take it; for it is allowable in all cases where the demurrer is not frivolous, if applied for in the same term.
Judgment for the defendant, with leave to withdraw the demurrer and plead issuably. '
What shall he a reasonable time depends on the circumstances oi the [372]*372case. Where a note payable on demand to order was made in England, and the maker removed to this state, it was held that a transfer and action brought within a year was not such a lapse of time as place the instrument in the situation of a dishonored note. Hendricks v. Judah, 1 Johns. Rep. 319. But where a note was drawn in this state payable to bearer on demand, and negotiated two months and a half after its date, the period was ruled sufficient to let in the equities of the maker against the payee, as a defenco to an action by the endorsee. Losee v. Dunkin, 1 Johns. Rep. 70.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2 Cai. Cas. 369 (Furman v. Haskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.