Furman v. Furman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Furman v. Furman

40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3583

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 666 (Furman v. Furman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furman v. Furman, 40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 25, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of fixing the sum to be paid by defendant for the support and maintenance of the child of the marriage at $175 per month and reducing the counsel fee to $800, less the sum of $300 already paid, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In the light of all the facts disclosed by the record, we are of the opinion that the amounts awarded for support and maintenance of the child and for counsel fees were excessive and should be reduced to the extent indicated. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, McNally, Steuer and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 25, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of fixing the sum to be paid by defendant for the support and maintenance of the child of the marriage at $175 per month and reducing the counsel fee to $800, less the sum of $300 already paid, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In the light of all the facts disclosed by the record, we are of the opinion that the amounts awarded for support and maintenance of the child and for counsel fees were excessive and should be reduced to the extent indicated. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, McNally, Steuer and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 666, 337 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furman-v-furman-nyappdiv-1972.