Furman v. Eauhouse

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Furman v. Eauhouse

1 N.J. (Manumission) 15

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1786·Published

Opinion

This action having been brought by Agreement of Parties under the Direction of the Court, to try the Property of a certain Negro Prime, and a Verdkft and Judgment having paffed in favor of the Plaintiff, It is ordered by the Court, on the Motion of Mr- Boulton for the Plaintiff, that the faid Negro Prime now in the Cuftody of the Sheriff of Hunterdon, agreeably to an Order of [16]*16thi~ Court of May Term laft, be delivered to the faid Moore Furman, Efq. Agent of Forfeitures for the County of Hunterdone. *

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action having been brought by Agreement of Parties under the Direction of the Court, to try the Property of a certain Negro Prime, and a Verdkft and Judgment having paffed in favor of the Plaintiff, It is ordered by the Court, on the Motion of Mr- Boulton for the Plaintiff, that the faid Negro Prime now in the Cuftody of the Sheriff of Hunterdon, agreeably to an Order of [16]*16thi~ Court of May Term laft, be delivered to the faid Moore Furman, Efq. Agent of Forfeitures for the County of Hunterdone. *

Furman v. Eauhouse, 1 N.J. (Manumission) 15 (N.J. 1786).

Pincite

1 N.J. (Manumission) 15 (Furman v. Eauhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.