Furman v. Czajka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Furman v. Czajka

261 A.D. 883, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7890

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1941·Published

Opinion

— • Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (One order strikes out the amended answer; one order directs plaintiff to show cause why appointment of receiver should not be vacated; one order dismisses defendants’ order to show cause and appoints a referee to compute; one order grants judgment of foreclosure.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— • Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (One order strikes out the amended answer; one order directs plaintiff to show cause why appointment of receiver should not be vacated; one order dismisses defendants’ order to show cause and appoints a referee to compute; one order grants judgment of foreclosure.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Furman v. Czajka, 261 A.D. 883, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 883 (Furman v. Czajka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.