Furman v. Czajka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Furman v. Czajka

261 A.D. 883, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 883 (Furman v. Czajka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furman v. Czajka, 261 A.D. 883, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

— • Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (One order strikes out the amended answer; one order directs plaintiff to show cause why appointment of receiver should not be vacated; one order dismisses defendants’ order to show cause and appoints a referee to compute; one order grants judgment of foreclosure.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— • Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (One order strikes out the amended answer; one order directs plaintiff to show cause why appointment of receiver should not be vacated; one order dismisses defendants’ order to show cause and appoints a referee to compute; one order grants judgment of foreclosure.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 883, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furman-v-czajka-nyappdiv-1941.