Furman v. Cunningham

New York Supreme Court

Furman v. Cunningham

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 606

DecidedJanuary 15, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 606 (Furman v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furman v. Cunningham, 41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 606 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

¥e ale of the opinion that the statute, chapter 237, Laws 1878, which gives a penalty not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than $100 “ with costs of suit,” authorizes the recovery of costs in this case. Section 3250 of the Code leaves that statute unaffected by the provisions of the Code relative to the recovery of costs. “ The award of costs is specially regulated ” by that statute.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.

Present. — Learned, P. J., and Bocees, J.; Landon, J., not acting.

Order allowing costs, affirmed with ten dollars costs, and printing disbursements. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

¥e ale of the opinion that the statute, chapter 237, Laws 1878, which gives a penalty not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than $100 “ with costs of suit,” authorizes the recovery of costs in this case. Section 3250 of the Code leaves that statute unaffected by the provisions of the Code relative to the recovery of costs. “ The award of costs is specially regulated ” by that statute.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.

Present. — Learned, P. J., and Bocees, J.; Landon, J., not acting.

Order allowing costs, affirmed with ten dollars costs, and printing disbursements. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furman-v-cunningham-nysupct-1885.