Furman D. Livingston, Sr. v. Department of Corrections
This text of Furman D. Livingston, Sr. v. Department of Corrections (Furman D. Livingston, Sr. v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 27, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1507 Lower Tribunal No. F09-2160 ________________
Furman D. Livingston, Sr., Petitioner,
vs.
Department of Corrections, et al., Respondents.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
Furman D. Livingston, Sr., in proper person.
Daniel Andrew Johnson (Tallahassee), for respondent Department of Corrections.
Before EMAS, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Wainwright v.
State, 411 So. 3d 392, 399-401 (Fla. 2025) (holding: “Hurst v. Florida, 577
U.S. 92, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), does not apply retroactively
to sentences that became final before the issuance of Ring [v. Arizona, 536
U.S. 584 (2002)]”; further holding that Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821
(2024) does not apply retroactively); see also Breedlove v. Singletary, 595
So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992) (“Habeas corpus is not a second appeal and cannot
be used to litigate or relitigate issues which could have been, should have
been, or were raised on direct appeal.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Furman D. Livingston, Sr. v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furman-d-livingston-sr-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2025.