Furlow v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Furlow v. State

381 S.W.3d 395, 2012 WL 4883190, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1299

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 97491·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Furlow appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth' the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Furlow appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth' the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Furlow v. State, 381 S.W.3d 395, 2012 WL 4883190, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1299 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

381 S.W.3d 395 (Furlow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.