Furlough v. State
213 S.W. 649, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 595
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of theft; his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The grounds of the motion for new trial, in the absence of the evidence, cannot be considered.
The judgment is therefore affirmed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Furlough v. State, 213 S.W. 649, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 595 (Tex. 1919).
213 S.W. 649 (Furlough v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.