Furlough v. Owens

94 S.E.2d 362, 244 N.C. 483, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 437
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 19, 1956·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It was admitted that defendants for a valuable consideration executed and delivered to the plaintiff an option to purchase described land upon stated terms, including payment of $1,800 in cash. Plaintiff testified that within the time limited he notified defendants that he elected to exercise the option, was ready, able and willing to comply with its terms, and demanded deed. Defendants failing to have deed prepared for delivery, plaintiff offered to have this done, but defendants refused. Plaintiff tendered cashier’s check for the initial payment and demanded deed. Defendants made no objection to the cashier’s check and gave no reason for their refusal to execute deed. Defendants offered no evidence in rebuttal;

The defendants’ refusal to comply with their contract relieved plaintiff of the necessity of making further tender or tendering cash, as such tender would have availed nothing. Penny v. Nowell, 231 N.C. 154, 56 S.E. 2d 428; Millikan v. Simmons, 244 N.C. 195, 93 S.E. 2d 59.

In the trial we find

No error.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furlough v. Owens, 94 S.E.2d 362, 244 N.C. 483, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 437 (N.C. 1956).

94 S.E.2d 362 (Furlough v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Millikan v. Simmons
93 S.E.2d 59 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Penny v. Nowell
56 S.E.2d 428 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)