Furlong v. Gair

14 Jones & S. 573
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided June 18, 1880·Published

Opinion

Opinion by Freedman, J. ; Sedgwick, Oh. J., concurred.

Judgment modified by deducting therefrom $269.83 erroneously allowed defendants for profits subsequent to their rescission of the contract with plaintiff, and by making recovery of defendants dependent upon a reassignment of their interest in the patents, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furlong v. Gair, 14 Jones & S. 573 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

14 Jones & S. 573 (Furlong v. Gair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.