Furlong v. Gair
This text of 14 Jones & S. 573 (Furlong v. Gair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by Freedman, J. ; Sedgwick, Oh. J., concurred.
Judgment modified by deducting therefrom $269.83 erroneously allowed defendants for profits subsequent to their rescission of the contract with plaintiff, and by making recovery of defendants dependent upon a reassignment of their interest in the patents, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Jones & S. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furlong-v-gair-nysuperctnyc-1880.