Furlong v. Gair
14 Jones & S. 573
Opinion
Opinion by Freedman, J. ; Sedgwick, Oh. J., concurred.
Judgment modified by deducting therefrom $269.83 erroneously allowed defendants for profits subsequent to their rescission of the contract with plaintiff, and by making recovery of defendants dependent upon a reassignment of their interest in the patents, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Furlong v. Gair, 14 Jones & S. 573 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).
14 Jones & S. 573 (Furlong v. Gair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.