Furlong v. Coleman
3 D.C. 178
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1827
StatusPublished
This text of 3 D.C. 178 (Furlong v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Furlong v. Coleman, 3 D.C. 178 (circtddc 1827).
Opinion
The Court (Thruston, J., absent,) said, that the rule being laid at the last term in open court, and not objected to, at that time, the burden of proof was now on the plaintiff to show that he was a resident of the county at that time. That the plaintiff, and his counsel were bound to take notice of all the orders made by the Court in the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 D.C. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furlong-v-coleman-circtddc-1827.