Furlan v. Fili

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Furlan v. Fili

242 A.D. 686

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 686 (Furlan v. Fili) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furlan v. Fili, 242 A.D. 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to open defendants’ default and to reinstate their

counterclaim, and order on reargument, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, upon condition that witMn ten days after service on the attorney for the plaintiff of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, defendants pay plaintiff twenty-five dollars costs; otherwise, order affirmed. The default was not willful and the motion to open it should have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, TompMns and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to open defendants’ default and to reinstate their

counterclaim, and order on reargument, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, upon condition that witMn ten days after service on the attorney for the plaintiff of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, defendants pay plaintiff twenty-five dollars costs; otherwise, order affirmed. The default was not willful and the motion to open it should have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, TompMns and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furlan-v-fili-nyappdiv-1934.