Furgison v. Robinson

1 Hopk. Ch. 8
New York Court of Chancery·Decided October 29, 1823·Published

Opinion

But by the court :

The neglect of the solicitor, is the neglect of his client. It can not be tolerated, that the complainant, after he has obtained an injunction, should prevent its dissolution by refusing or neglecting to deliver a copy of the bill. If the defendant appears, it is the duty of the complainant’s solicitor to serve him with a copy of the bill without delay.

For the neglect of the complainant to serve such copy in season, the injunction must be dissolved.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furgison v. Robinson, 1 Hopk. Ch. 8 (N.Y. 1823).

1 Hopk. Ch. 8 (Furgison v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.