Furgison v. Robinson

New York Court of Chancery

Furgison v. Robinson

1 Hopk. Ch. 8

DecidedOctober 29, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hopk. Ch. 8 (Furgison v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furgison v. Robinson, 1 Hopk. Ch. 8 (N.Y. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

But by the court :

The neglect of the solicitor, is the neglect of his client. It can not be tolerated, that the complainant, after he has obtained an injunction, should prevent its dissolution by refusing or neglecting to deliver a copy of the bill. If the defendant appears, it is the duty of the complainant’s solicitor to serve him with a copy of the bill without delay.

For the neglect of the complainant to serve such copy in season, the injunction must be dissolved.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But by the court :

The neglect of the solicitor, is the neglect of his client. It can not be tolerated, that the complainant, after he has obtained an injunction, should prevent its dissolution by refusing or neglecting to deliver a copy of the bill. If the defendant appears, it is the duty of the complainant’s solicitor to serve him with a copy of the bill without delay.

For the neglect of the complainant to serve such copy in season, the injunction must be dissolved.

Order accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Hopk. Ch. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furgison-v-robinson-nychanct-1823.