Furey v. Salaam
This text of Furey v. Salaam (Furey v. Salaam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JUSTIN FUREY, § § No. 528, 2024 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Court of § Chancery of the State of v. § Delaware § SAKEENAH SALAAM, § C.A. No. 2023-0252 § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: September 26, 2025 Decided: October 31, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After considering the opening brief and the record below, we find it evident
that the Court of Chancery’s judgment should be affirmed on the basis of the court’s
December 2, 2024 order approving the Magistrate in Chancery’s final report dated
November 8, 2024. The appellant did not file exceptions to the Magistrate’s report
and therefore did not preserve any issues for review on appeal.1
1 See Cowan v. Furlow, 2024 WL 4362264, at *2 (Del. Sept. 30, 2024) (“This Court has long held that substantive challenges to a Magistrate’s final report that are not raised in exceptions under Court of Chancery Rule 144 are not preserved for review on appeal to this Court.”). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Furey v. Salaam, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furey-v-salaam-del-2025.