Furci v. Furci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Furci v. Furci

45 A.D.2d 1003, 358 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4241

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 29, 1974·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant husband from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 14, 1973, upon his default, which denied his motion for an order (1) vacating a previous judgment of said court dated January 5, 1972 (also [1004]*1004obtained upon default) directing him to pay the plaintiff wife the sum of $5,465 on account of alimony, mortgage payments and counsel fees, (2) granting him leave to oppose the motion upon which the above judgment was made. Appeal dismissed, without costs. A party may not appeal directly from an order entered upon his default, the proper remedy being an application to open the default made to the rendering court (see CPLR 5511, 5015; Bishop v. Gilmore, 30 A D 2d 696; Ross v. Magid, 22 A D 2d 829; D’Aliso v. Toback, 9 A D 2d 894; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5511.10; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev. ed.], ■§ 93). Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant husband from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 14, 1973, upon his default, which denied his motion for an order (1) vacating a previous judgment of said court dated January 5, 1972 (also [1004]*1004obtained upon default) directing him to pay the plaintiff wife the sum of $5,465 on account of alimony, mortgage payments and counsel fees, (2) granting him leave to oppose the motion upon which the above judgment was made. Appeal dismissed, without costs. A party may not appeal directly from an order entered upon his default, the proper remedy being an application to open the default made to the rendering court (see CPLR 5511, 5015; Bishop v. Gilmore, 30 A D 2d 696; Ross v. Magid, 22 A D 2d 829; D’Aliso v. Toback, 9 A D 2d 894; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5511.10; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev. ed.], ■§ 93). Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Furci v. Furci, 45 A.D.2d 1003, 358 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

45 A.D.2d 1003 (Furci v. Furci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related