Furchgott v. Hottinger

265 A.D. 803, 37 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5785
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Furchgott v. Hottinger. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 A.D. 389

Opinion

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furchgott v. Hottinger, 265 A.D. 803, 37 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 803 (Furchgott v. Hottinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.