Furches v. Moore

269 S.E.2d 635, 48 N.C. App. 430, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3238
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 19, 1980
Docket803DC291
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 269 S.E.2d 635 (Furches v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Furches v. Moore, 269 S.E.2d 635, 48 N.C. App. 430, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3238 (N.C. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant attempts to appeal as a matter of right to this Court from the discretionary order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for change of venue pursuant to N.C.G.S. 1-83(2), for the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice. Defendant cannot so do. The order of Judge Ragan was an interlocutory order, not finally disposing of the case. N.C. Gen. Stat. 7A-27(c). It does not fall within the provisions of N.C.G.S. 7A-27(d), which allows appeal as a matter of right from certain interlocutory orders. Defendant’s appeal must be and is

Dismissed.

Judges Arnold and Erwin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawley v. Hobgood
622 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Perkins v. CCH Computax, Inc.
415 S.E.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
Kennon v. Kennon
323 S.E.2d 741 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 S.E.2d 635, 48 N.C. App. 430, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furches-v-moore-ncctapp-1980.