Furches v. Moore

269 S.E.2d 635, 48 N.C. App. 430, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3238
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided August 19, 1980·No. 803DC291·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant attempts to appeal as a matter of right to this Court from the discretionary order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for change of venue pursuant to N.C.G.S. 1-83(2), for the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice. Defendant cannot so do. The order of Judge Ragan was an interlocutory order, not finally disposing of the case. N.C. Gen. Stat. 7A-27(c). It does not fall within the provisions of N.C.G.S. 7A-27(d), which allows appeal as a matter of right from certain interlocutory orders. Defendant’s appeal must be and is

Dismissed.

Judges Arnold and Erwin concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Furches v. Moore, 269 S.E.2d 635, 48 N.C. App. 430, 1980 N.C. App. LEXIS 3238 (N.C. Ct. App. 1980).

269 S.E.2d 635 (Furches v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawley v. Hobgood
622 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Perkins v. CCH Computax, Inc.
415 S.E.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1992)
Kennon v. Kennon
323 S.E.2d 741 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)