Furbeck v. Holman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Furbeck v. Holman

91 P. 1132, 77 Kan. 841, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 198

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 5, 1907

DocketNo. 15,000

StatusPublished

This text of 91 P. 1132 (Furbeck v. Holman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Furbeck v. Holman, 91 P. 1132, 77 Kan. 841, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 198 (kan 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The contract introduced in evidence over the plaintiff’s objection corroborated the defendant’s testimony. All other matters discussed depend upon what the facts were. The facts were found generally by the trial court adversely to the plaintiff upon conflicting oral testimony, and under the well-known rule this court cannot interfere.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The contract introduced in evidence over the plaintiff’s objection corroborated the defendant’s testimony. All other matters discussed depend upon what the facts were. The facts were found generally by the trial court adversely to the plaintiff upon conflicting oral testimony, and under the well-known rule this court cannot interfere.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 P. 1132, 77 Kan. 841, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/furbeck-v-holman-kan-1907.