Fuqua v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
This text of 548 So. 2d 310 (Fuqua v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In McDill v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co., 475 So.2d 1085 (La.1985), this Court recognized the obligation of an uninsured motorist insurer, in cases of indisputable liability, to make a good faith unconditional tender in an amount over which reasonable minds could not differ or be subject to penalties and attorney’s fees for arbitrary failure to do so. The court of appeal, although observing that the $617,000 judgment might be somewhat high, nevertheless assessed a twelve percent penalty on the full amount of the judgment. In my view the court of appeal, for purposes of the penalty, should have determined the lowest reasonable amount over which reasonable minds could not differ and then assessed the penalty only on that amount.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 So. 2d 310, 1989 La. LEXIS 2044, 1989 WL 108678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuqua-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-la-1989.