Funsoosten v. Summit Foundry Co.

115 A.D. 894, 100 N.Y.S. 1117

This text of 115 A.D. 894 (Funsoosten v. Summit Foundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Funsoosten v. Summit Foundry Co., 115 A.D. 894, 100 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and motion granted, without costs. Held, that wherever the complaint alleges, after specifying defects, or otherwise” failed, etc., the order should require the plaintiff to state in what particulars the defendant failed-to -perform its duty to the plaintiff; in what respect the place where the plaintiff was at work was “ otherwise” dangerous, and in what respect the plaintiff was “ otherwise severely injured.” In case the plaintiff' elects to strike these various allegations from the complaint, he will be permitted to do so, in which .event the motion .is denied, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in this court to the appellant. The form of the order to be settled by and before Mr. Justice Spring on two days’ notice. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D. 894, 100 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funsoosten-v-summit-foundry-co-nyappdiv-1906.