Funkenstein v. Elgutter

11 Cal. 328
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 11 Cal. 328 (Funkenstein v. Elgutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Funkenstein v. Elgutter, 11 Cal. 328 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

1st. The County Court erred in refusing to dismiss the appeal from the judgment of the Justice.

2d. The Court erred in trying the case anew, as there was no issue of fact in the Justice’s Court from which defendants could appeal. Nor could the Court try said cause on questions of law, as appellant had filed no statement of the grounds upon which he intended to rely. The People ex rel. Jones v. The County Court of El Dorado County, 10 Cal. 19.

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—

Baldwin, J., concurring.

Ordered that the judgment of the County Court be reversed, with' directions to dismiss the appeal from the Justice’s Court, on the authority of The People v. The County Court of El Dorado Co., 10 Cal. 19.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Clyne
101 P. 819 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1909)
Armantage v. Superior Court
81 P. 1033 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)
Italian-Swiss Agricultural Colony v. Bartagnolli
61 P. 1020 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1900)
Maxson v. Superior Court
54 P. 520 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Gage v. Maryatt
9 Mont. 265 (Montana Supreme Court, 1890)
Fabretti v. Superior Court
19 P. 481 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Ketchum v. Superior Court
4 P. 492 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Paul v. Armstrong
1 Nev. 82 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Cal. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funkenstein-v-elgutter-cal-1858.