Funk, Valorie Natavia

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 17, 2025
DocketWR-96,704-01
StatusPublished

This text of Funk, Valorie Natavia (Funk, Valorie Natavia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Funk, Valorie Natavia, (Tex. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-96,704-01

EX PARTE VALORIE NATAVIA FUNK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 11821 IN THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT RAINS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Applicant pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and was originally placed on deferred

adjudication. Later, she was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. She filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

This application is non-compliant because it is not properly verified with either (1) a “wet”

signature, especially if the signing is done before a notary; or (2) a digital signature which is verified

through encryption technology to ensure the identity of the person and the authenticity of the

document. This Court is choosing to ignore the compliancy issue because Applicant is entitled to

relief. Ex parte Golden, 991 S.W.2d 859 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). 2

Applicant contends that she was denied her right to an appeal because counsel failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. Based on the record, the trial court has found that counsel failed to

timely file a notice of appeal.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Jones v. State,

98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of her conviction

in cause number 6015 from the 8th District Court of Rains County. Within ten days from the date

of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant

is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent

her on direct appeal. Should Applicant decide to appeal, she must file a written notice of appeal in

the trial court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: September 17, 2025 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Axel
757 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Ex Parte Golden
991 S.W.2d 859 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Jones v. State
98 S.W.3d 700 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Funk, Valorie Natavia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funk-valorie-natavia-texcrimapp-2025.