Funk v. Swearingen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Funk v. Swearingen

96 A. 467, 251 Pa. 229, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 662

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 18, 1915

DocketMiscellaneous Docket, No. 190

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A. 467 (Funk v. Swearingen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Funk v. Swearingen, 96 A. 467, 251 Pa. 229, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 662 (Pa. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

And now, October 18, 1915, the five members of the court who duly considered this petition, to which an insufficient answer has been filed, are of one mind that the petitioner is entitled to the writ of mandamus for which he prays, and it is so ordered. The petition of the members of the bar of Fayette County, filed by permission of the court, has no proper place in the pleadings. Let the writ of mandamus go out at respondent’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

And now, October 18, 1915, the five members of the court who duly considered this petition, to which an insufficient answer has been filed, are of one mind that the petitioner is entitled to the writ of mandamus for which he prays, and it is so ordered. The petition of the members of the bar of Fayette County, filed by permission of the court, has no proper place in the pleadings. Let the writ of mandamus go out at respondent’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A. 467, 251 Pa. 229, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funk-v-swearingen-pa-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack