Funk v. Kaiser-Frazer Sales Corp.
This text of 15 A.D.2d 548 (Funk v. Kaiser-Frazer Sales Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Two substantial errors of law require reversal and a new trial: First, the alleged written warranty was admitted into evidence without proper foundation showing a connection between defendant and the paper; second, in its charge the court assumed that this exhibit was binding on the defendant and, in effect, withdrew this question from the jury. Both errors were saved by exception for our consideration. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 548, 222 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funk-v-kaiser-frazer-sales-corp-nyappdiv-1961.