Funk v. James

22 Kan. 685
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided July 15, 1879·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment in the above case must be reversed, upon the authority of Knox v. Dunn, just decided. The findings of the court will be set aside, and a new trial ordered. Upon a new trial, under like evidence produced by the' defendant in error in this case, the district court ought to render judgment for costs in favor of the plaintiff in error, the defendant below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Funk v. James, 22 Kan. 685 (kan 1879).

22 Kan. 685 (Funk v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gandy v. Board of Commissioners of Chase County
23 Kan. 738 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1880)