Funk v. Arnold

3 Yeates 428
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 15, 1802·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It turned out in evidence, that the dam was erected in the Ray’s town branch of Juniata, near the mouth of Dunning’s creek, where it falls into Juniata, and the court ordered the plaintiff to be-called on account oh the variance.

■Plaintiff nonsuit.

MEMORANDUM.

The report of the case of the attorney general and the grantees, under the acts of assembly of 3d April 1792, would follow here; but the author having furnished Mr. Dallas with his report of the case, which is printed totidem verbis in 4Dallas 237, it is therefore omitted in this,publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Funk v. Arnold, 3 Yeates 428 (Pa. 1802).

3 Yeates 428 (Funk v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Macumber v. White River Log & Booming Co.
17 N.W. 806 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1883)