Funk v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Funk v. Arnold

3 Yeates 428

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 15, 1802

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Yeates 428 (Funk v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Funk v. Arnold, 3 Yeates 428 (Pa. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

It turned out in evidence, that the dam was erected in the Ray’s town branch of Juniata, near the mouth of Dunning’s creek, where it falls into Juniata, and the court ordered the plaintiff to be-called on account oh the variance.

■Plaintiff nonsuit.

MEMORANDUM.

The report of the case of the attorney general and the grantees, under the acts of assembly of 3d April 1792, would follow here; but the author having furnished Mr. Dallas with his report of the case, which is printed totidem verbis in 4Dallas 237, it is therefore omitted in this,publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It turned out in evidence, that the dam was erected in the Ray’s town branch of Juniata, near the mouth of Dunning’s creek, where it falls into Juniata, and the court ordered the plaintiff to be-called on account oh the variance.

■Plaintiff nonsuit.

MEMORANDUM.

The report of the case of the attorney general and the grantees, under the acts of assembly of 3d April 1792, would follow here; but the author having furnished Mr. Dallas with his report of the case, which is printed totidem verbis in 4Dallas 237, it is therefore omitted in this,publication.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Yeates 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funk-v-arnold-pa-1802.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack