Funk v. Allstate Insurance
This text of 412 A.2d 1049 (Funk v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Haines in his opinion in the trial court, 169 N.J.Super. 226 (Law Div.1979), except that our agreement with that opinion should not be deemed to reflect a unanimous agreement on our part with the expression of our brethren in Clay v. N. J. Special Joint Underwriting Ass’n, 160 N.J.Super. 188 (App.Div.1978). We need not undertake a reconsideration of the principles of Clay at this time since appellant’s decedent was not and, of course, now can never be in an occupational status because of his disability. The circumstances with which we deal are thus distinguishable and clearly beyond the coverage mandated by the statute or in the policy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 A.2d 1049, 172 N.J. Super. 458, 1980 N.J. Super. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funk-v-allstate-insurance-njsuperctappdiv-1980.