Funge v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Funge v. Superior Court

113 Cal. App. 467

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 16, 1931

DocketCiv. No. 7931

StatusPublished

This text of 113 Cal. App. 467 (Funge v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Funge v. Superior Court, 113 Cal. App. 467 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petition for a writ of rnandanws to compel the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco to pay petitioner a certain sum of money, together with exemplary damages, for issuing a certain execution in an action in which petitioner was a party. It is also prayed that the writ of execution referred to he annulled and set. aside. Petitioner has a complete remedy in an action at law, if any exists, for. the relief which he here seeks. The application is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Petition for a writ of rnandanws to compel the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco to pay petitioner a certain sum of money, together with exemplary damages, for issuing a certain execution in an action in which petitioner was a party. It is also prayed that the writ of execution referred to he annulled and set. aside. Petitioner has a complete remedy in an action at law, if any exists, for. the relief which he here seeks. The application is therefore denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 Cal. App. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funge-v-superior-court-calctapp-1931.