Fung Chong & Co. v. United States
20 Cust. Ct. 319, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 280
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fung Chong & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 Cust. Ct. 37 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 14, 1948·No. No. 52331; protest 969279-G (San Francisco)·Published
Opinion
[320]*320Opinion by
Lily bulbs stipulated to be the same in all material respects as the bak hop the subject of Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude, drugs. Chinese wiue stipulated to be the same as that the subject of Wing Duck Co. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446) was held exempt from assessment under the Liquor Taxing Act of 1934, as an alcoholic medicinal preparation. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fung Chong & Co. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 319, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 280 (cusc 1948).
20 Cust. Ct. 319 (Fung Chong & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States
5 Cust. Ct. 70 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)
Wing Duck Co. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 133 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)