Funes y Carillo v. President of the Bank of the United States

10 Rob. 533
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 Rob. 533 (Funes y Carillo v. President of the Bank of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Funes y Carillo v. President of the Bank of the United States, 10 Rob. 533 (La. 1845).

Opinion

Martin, J.

The plaintiff is appellant from a judgment of non suit on his claim for $48,400 and interest, the amount of ten post-notes of the defendants, neither of which is as yet payable. It has been, however, contended, that the bank is notoriously insolvent, and that, therefore, the debts which it owes are all exigible. The first judge has, in our opinion, correctly held, that an actual bankruptcy or cessio bonorum, either voluntary or forced, alone has the effect of rendering immediately exigible debts which have not yet matured by the lapse of the time stipulated in the contract, or the happening of the contingency on which the parties agreed that they’should become immediately payable. Civil Code, art. 2049. 8 La. 585. As to the terest, which was payable semi-annually," and at a particular place in London stated in the"coupons, the judge has^conformed himself to the jurisprudence of this court, which is, that when a debt is made payable at a particular place, a demand by the creditor there is a condition precedent, which must be complied with, before the institution of any suit. 12 La. 473.

The plaintiff has attempted to justify^his preceeding on the coupons, by the introduction of a witness stating’hircumstances which authorize it. But this gentleman has not mentioned anything tending that way, from his personal knowledge.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C. T. Patterson Co. v. Port Barre Lumber Co.
66 So. 418 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
Kleinwort & Cohen v. Klingender Bros.
14 La. Ann. 96 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1859)
Montgomery v. Tutt
11 Cal. 307 (California Supreme Court, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Rob. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funes-y-carillo-v-president-of-the-bank-of-the-united-states-la-1845.