Fundora v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fundora v. State

240 So. 3d 778

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 2018·No. No. 4D17–1230·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed . See State v. Hawkins , 790 So.2d 492, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (affirming robbery conviction, court noted that defendant's act of driving a "truck, while [victim] was hanging onto the side resisting the theft, was an act of force intended, in part, to overcome resistance to the taking."); Lovett v. State , 781 So.2d 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (finding sufficient "violence" to affirm carjacking conviction where victim jumped on car's hood and defendant accelerated car while victim was on hood).

Gross, Taylor and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Affirmed . See State v. Hawkins , 790 So.2d 492, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (affirming robbery conviction, court noted that defendant's act of driving a "truck, while [victim] was hanging onto the side resisting the theft, was an act of force intended, in part, to overcome resistance to the taking."); Lovett v. State , 781 So.2d 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (finding sufficient "violence" to affirm carjacking conviction where victim jumped on car's hood and defendant accelerated car while victim was on hood).

Gross, Taylor and Kuntz, JJ., concur.

Fundora v. State, 240 So. 3d 778 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

240 So. 3d 778 (Fundora v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related