Fundora v. State

573 So. 2d 454, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1991 WL 15596
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 1991·No. No. 90-1669·Published

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the state’s confession of error and our review of the record, the defendant’s conviction for trafficking is reversed for a new trial because of the fundamental error involved in the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the material and disputed elements of intent and knowledge. See State v. Dominguez, 509 So.2d 917 (Fla.1987); Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149, 103 S.Ct. 793, 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fundora v. State, 573 So. 2d 454, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1991 WL 15596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

573 So. 2d 454 (Fundora v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
400 So. 2d 542 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Dominguez
509 So. 2d 917 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)