Fundora v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fundora v. State

573 So. 2d 454, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1991 WL 15596

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1669

StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 454 (Fundora v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fundora v. State, 573 So. 2d 454, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1991 WL 15596 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the state’s confession of error and our review of the record, the defendant’s conviction for trafficking is reversed for a new trial because of the fundamental error involved in the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the material and disputed elements of intent and knowledge. See State v. Dominguez, 509 So.2d 917 (Fla.1987); Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149, 103 S.Ct. 793, 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the state’s confession of error and our review of the record, the defendant’s conviction for trafficking is reversed for a new trial because of the fundamental error involved in the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the material and disputed elements of intent and knowledge. See State v. Dominguez, 509 So.2d 917 (Fla.1987); Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149, 103 S.Ct. 793, 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 So. 2d 454, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1991 WL 15596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fundora-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack