Funderburk v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Funderburk v. State

85 S.E.2d 640, 91 Ga. App. 373, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 745

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 19, 1955

Docket35445

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 S.E.2d 640 (Funderburk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Funderburk v. State, 85 S.E.2d 640, 91 Ga. App. 373, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 745 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Carlisle, J.

There are two essential elements in the offense of abandonment of minor children: (1) desertion, that is, the wilful forsaking and desertion of the duties of parenthood; (2) dependency, that is, leaving such children in a dependent condition; and before a parent may be convicted of this offense, under the provisions of Code (Ann. Supp.) § 74-9902, there must be proof of both elements. Blackwell v. State, 48 Ga. App. 221 (172 S. E. 670); Glad v. State, 85 Ga. App. 312 (69 S. E. 2d 699); Brock v. State, 51 Ga. App. 414, 418 (180 S. E. 644); Bowling v. State, 62 Ga. App. 540 (8 S. E. 2d 697); Brock v. State, 54 Ga. App. 403 (187 S. E. 906). Under an application of the foregoing principle of law to the facts of the present case, the evidence, together with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, failed to establish the element of desertion, and consequently the trial court erred in denying the motion’for a new trial based solely on the general grounds. The evidence shows the defendant to be a peripatetic painter by trade. He worked wherever work was available. His family, consisting of his wife and four children, lived in Hall County, Georgia; and, although he had been working and living in New Orleans for approximately eighteen months prior to the return of the indictment for abandonment, he returned to his wife and children every two or three months and was at home in fact when arrested for abandonment. During the time he was in New Orleans, he sent his wife at least 39 money orders, totalling S578.57, and on his visits to the wife and children gave the wife certain unspecified amounts of money. While the jury was authorized to find that the defendant’s contributions to the support of his children were meager indeed, the jury was not authorized to find or infer that the defendant had wilfully forsaken and deserted his parental duties.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlisle, J.

There are two essential elements in the offense of abandonment of minor children: (1) desertion, that is, the wilful forsaking and desertion of the duties of parenthood; (2) dependency, that is, leaving such children in a dependent condition; and before a parent may be convicted of this offense, under the provisions of Code (Ann. Supp.) § 74-9902, there must be proof of both elements. Blackwell v. State, 48 Ga. App. 221 (172 S. E. 670); Glad v. State, 85 Ga. App. 312 (69 S. E. 2d 699); Brock v. State, 51 Ga. App. 414, 418 (180 S. E. 644); Bowling v. State, 62 Ga. App. 540 (8 S. E. 2d 697); Brock v. State, 54 Ga. App. 403 (187 S. E. 906). Under an application of the foregoing principle of law to the facts of the present case, the evidence, together with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, failed to establish the element of desertion, and consequently the trial court erred in denying the motion’for a new trial based solely on the general grounds. The evidence shows the defendant to be a peripatetic painter by trade. He worked wherever work was available. His family, consisting of his wife and four children, lived in Hall County, Georgia; and, although he had been working and living in New Orleans for approximately eighteen months prior to the return of the indictment for abandonment, he returned to his wife and children every two or three months and was at home in fact when arrested for abandonment. During the time he was in New Orleans, he sent his wife at least 39 money orders, totalling S578.57, and on his visits to the wife and children gave the wife certain unspecified amounts of money. While the jury was authorized to find that the defendant’s contributions to the support of his children were meager indeed, the jury was not authorized to find or infer that the defendant had wilfully forsaken and deserted his parental duties.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E.2d 640, 91 Ga. App. 373, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funderburk-v-state-gactapp-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack