Funck v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

Funck v. Pierce

848 N.E.2d 515, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1485

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 26, 2006

Docket2006-0819

StatusPublished

This text of 848 N.E.2d 515 (Funck v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Funck v. Pierce, 848 N.E.2d 515, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1485 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-050487. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due May 22, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-050487. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due May 22, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

848 N.E.2d 515, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/funck-v-pierce-ohio-2006.