Funck v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

Funck v. Pierce

848 N.E.2d 515, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1485

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 2006·No. 2006-0819·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-050487. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due May 22, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-050487. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due May 22, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Funck v. Pierce, 848 N.E.2d 515, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1485 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

848 N.E.2d 515 (Funck v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.