Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc.

188 A.D.2d 1014
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 A.D.2d 1014 (Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc., 188 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to plaintiffs. The agreement for the sale of the laundromat business to plaintiffs provides: "Contract subject to assuming or negotiating lease acceptable to purchasers.” The record establishes that plaintiffs were unable to assume or negotiate a lease acceptable to them. Therefore, plaintiffs are entitled to the return of their deposit

[1015]*1015(see, Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard, 61 NY2d 106, 113; Perna v Desai, 101 AD2d 857, affd 63 NY2d 898). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Optometrix, Inc.
75 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 A.D.2d 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fumerelle-v-performance-rides-inc-nyappdiv-1992.