Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc.

188 A.D.2d 1014
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to plaintiffs. The agreement for the sale of the laundromat business to plaintiffs provides: "Contract subject to assuming or negotiating lease acceptable to purchasers.” The record establishes that plaintiffs were unable to assume or negotiate a lease acceptable to them. Therefore, plaintiffs are entitled to the return of their deposit

[1015] (see, Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard, 61 NY2d 106, 113; Perna v Desai, 101 AD2d 857, affd 63 NY2d 898). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc., 188 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 1014 (Fumerelle v. Performance Rides, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Optometrix, Inc.
75 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)