Fults v. Paul

New York Supreme Court

Fults v. Paul

14 N.Y.S. 4

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 N.Y.S. 4 (Fults v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fults v. Paul, 14 N.Y.S. 4 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a creditors’ bill to set aside a conveyance of land as in fraud of the plaintiff. The only question presented by this appeal is-that of the fraudulent intent of the respondent’s intestate, and that question is, by statute, one of fact, and not of law. 2 Rev. St. p. 137, § 4. The case on. this appeal—which was submitted at the last term without oral argument— [5]*5nowhere shows that it contains all the evidence given on the trial, and we cannot, therefore, review the referee’s finding on the question of fact. The judgment must be affirmed. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a creditors’ bill to set aside a conveyance of land as in fraud of the plaintiff. The only question presented by this appeal is-that of the fraudulent intent of the respondent’s intestate, and that question is, by statute, one of fact, and not of law. 2 Rev. St. p. 137, § 4. The case on. this appeal—which was submitted at the last term without oral argument— [5]*5nowhere shows that it contains all the evidence given on the trial, and we cannot, therefore, review the referee’s finding on the question of fact. The judgment must be affirmed. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.Y.S. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fults-v-paul-nysupct-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack